06/05/2012

NEXT POST
Windows Alta Vista For the sampling the physical sensors, samples and integrators had been located inside of the sterilizer for physical qualification in the positions: 1DE, 1AD, 2AA, 2DD, 3AC, 3CC, 3DC, 4AD, 4DE, 5AA and 5DD. For the chemical qualification they had been used n (54) Enterais Bottles of 300 ml to determine the aeration time. Validation of the Analytical Method the analytical method bases on the described methodology for Nagaroto & Penna and was validated following recommendations ANVISA7 and band of in agreement application limit of USP 30 using EtO as 10 working standard g/ml. The validation of method GCFID was established following the recommendations for category II, which reports for methodology of quantification of frmaco in medicines that are evaluated the parameters of especificidade, linearity, precision intra-race and Inter-races, exactness, robustness, limit of detention and limit of quantification. The used system of analysis was the gaseous chromatography Young Lin 6100 series; software Windows Alta Vista and chromatographic conditions as methodology validada6 and composed system of oven with initial temperature of 60C, time of balance of 1 minute, slope of 20,00C per minute, final temperature of 230C and time of analysis of 11 minutes; column (ZBWax): constant flow drags of 1,8 ml/min. in the dimensions of 30mx0,25mmx0,25m (film) for gas of it drags nitrogen, detector of flame for ionization (FID): temperature of 250C, hydrogen flow of 30 ml/min and 300 synthetic air flow of ml/min. The time will be approved of aeration with analyzed results that g/ml in relation to the lesser time, established in the concentration observed and calculated through the gotten chromatograms in accordance with to allow to the residual waste in the limit of 10 the criteria of the farmacopia americana8. After the sterilization, the samples had been placed in aeration room 55C and 27 exchanges of air...
PREVIOUS POST
The Dark Side This is one of the questions that more I hear for there. Already I witnessed quarrels heated between profession colleagues whom they had opted to using one or another platform, each one defending the program of its choice as if this was the legitimate representative of the supremacy in audio. Well, here it is what I think regarding this: incua is a quarrel. It does not lose its time with these baboseiras! It thinks about the process of creation of music of the following form: the idea that is fervilhando in its head is its city of origin and finished music, ready to be appreciated by its fans, customers or friends, is its city of destination. The programs of audio nothing more are of what the roads lead that you of a point to another one. believes me, ALL to these takes you roads to the final destination. It observes what in the sample the recent history of music. Multi-tracks have very little time behind the musicians had only the analogical recorders to cover this way. It thinks that this type of equipment (that I used very and adore) she was one crooked and dangerous beaten soil road (the comparison is joust therefore was necessary to be sufficiently experienced to operate these machines with efficiency). Very well, of ownership of this alternative the artists of that one not distant time had produced workmanships fantastic. He sees the example of the Beatles, Pink Floyd or Led Zeppelin, to cite only some. All these faces had placed its musical ideas inside of an old one and surrada Combi turkey hen, if they had put for estradinha of land of one or two counts and had registered true masterpieces. I ask to you there: the responsible one for these successes was the coil...

Recent Comments