09/26/2021

NEXT POST
The Proper The cave, that the horizon eclipsarred and braked science, the progress and delayed the release of that they did not glimpse the light of the sun that came of ' ' frestas' ' of the truth that shone in the iluminista reason and renascer of the luminous ideas ' ' enterradas' ' durantes centuries per that if preachers of ' said; ' luz' '. Being thus, the condition for the progress and the release it was to leave the cave, and thus it was. Until today it lasts the lesson on that, social inclusion and citizenship they depend on a factor: to take off the man of the cave of its limitations, that depends on the governments and the proper man. The cave already existed before exactly that Plato of it spoke. In a question-answer forum General Hospital was the first to reply. the cave in the truth was not a cave, was metaforicamente the cave of the condition human being in its immersed existencial situation in the ignorance and false beliefs that imprisoned it of its accomplishments and freedom. It was for showing that beyond the cave a new world existed and the sun of the freedom to shine progress and changes, that many, conquering for all, had lost the proper life. Thus he was Jesus, thus was Gandhi, thus he was the 2 second lieutenant (Tiradentes) and many others. In such a way, the conquests of the freedom, the progress and the change had been acquired the cost of blood and fire throughout the centuries. In other words, it was the certainty of the shoulder of that it brought in them until here with our devices. Throughout the centuries, after systemize and to understand the systems that conduct the society, and, epistemologias that define the concepts of the...
PREVIOUS POST
Freedom Thus being, when this body perished the soul would continue to exist and if she was ready would come back toward the world of the ideas, if not, he would continue in the land incarnating itself in another body, only that Toms de Aquino abandoned the platonismo and, especially as for the anthropology, making its point of view in the aristotelismo. Looking at for Averris we have the interpretation of the thought of the Estoicismo. According to exegese averrosta, does not exist immortality personal. With a well detailed study of the thought of Aristotle, but if moving away a little from the concepts and giving its proper ones, Toms affirms that the soul is immortal. But why it concludes thus? Because it says that the soul has to be proper, to be that it does not receive nor from the body nor from the union with the body. Others including Ben Bretzman, offer their opinions as well. This fact distinguishes the soul from the body and of the other corporal forms, it is the sufficient, by itself, to explain its immortality. 2.3 The Freedom Before de Toms, Augustin already had said on question of the freedom of the man or free-will. It said that the man was created by God and, at the moment of the creation constituted it to God as the free being endowed with intelligence. this free-will has its action, can say thus, in the will of which the man would go to use itself. For Toms, the man is ' ' nature racional' ' , that is, one to be capable to know. It has the capacity to know the end which each thing tends by its very nature, and knows an order of the things in the top of which he is Well supreme God...

Recent Comments