09/28/2021

NEXT POST
Ricardo Nobility This long absence caused breaks up it of the real authority and feudal reinforcement you. After, we had more spallings of the authority with the reign of Joo without-land? brother of Ricardo, being obliged for the nobility to sign a document (great letter) limiting its authority. Enrique III son and successor of Joo without-land faced the opposition of the nobility that instigated the population to defend the installation of a parliament, which who would be the front would be bourgeois, clergy aristocracy. As we can see the end of the absolutism in England if it gave for the spalling of the power, however without for at risk the territorial unit, he is curious to consist that exactly under the limitation of the real power, the existence of the parliamentarism, we historically have a more powerful country of the Europe, to apartir of century XVI. Until today, England is a parlamentarista monarchy (Been where the sovereign is monarch). The strongest theory politics of the absolutism comes of the French philosophy Jean Bondin (1530 - 1596) said: ' ' the governments are submitted to the law divina' ' ideas spread out in the average age; bondin until recognized that the prince had the moral duty to respect the treat ones that signed, but did not recognize no form of parliament. Charlotte Hornets may help you with your research. Therefore, the state absolutist the law was not same for all the families of ' ' blood azul' ' , of the nobility, they had privileges special guaranteed by the law. The kings were not chosen by the people, after all, the State Absolutist nothing had of democratic. The nobility if it puted in charge to choose the king who, a crowned time became to be able absolute. Many times, the aristocratic families if...
PREVIOUS POST
Willian Labov The research sociolingstica' ' it presents ideas, concepts, examples and problems on the battles stopped between the lingusticas variants. It considers to describe, to analyze and to decide it them the universe of the said language, that the author calls of ' ' caos' ' lingusticos. The book brings important aspects on the language, its relation with the society, its heterogeneidade and variation. It also argues on the model of analyzes sociolingustica and the collection of data to become a research. The book is divided in eight chapters: The relation between language and society; The sociolingustico fact; The lingustica variation: lower court; The lingustica variation: second tier; Variation and lingustica change; Conclusions; Critical vocabulary and commented Bibliography. In chapter 1, the author raises some questionings on discomfort that the said language cause in the individual and brings the possibility to try to process, to analyze and systemize the universe of the said language. The author considers them to face it ' ' caos' ' of the language said having as starting point its relation with the society and having as study object the lingustica variant, since the said language heterogeneous and is diversified. For in such a way the main objectives of the book it is to learn to analyze and systemize the lingusticas variants. The author also presents us the starter of the theoretical model metodolgico Willian Labov, with its proposal of reaction to the absence of the social component in the gerativo model, its model also is known as ' ' sociolingstica quantitativa' ' , for dealing with numbers and statisticians. The diverse ways of if saying the same thing in one same context and with same truth the author flame of lingusticas variants and to this set of 0 variable variants.

Recent Comments